The noun word "truth" is a simple word, it has one
basic definition, and in 2024, this is a word that matters, the direction of our
nation depends on defining the word "truth."
Unequivocally, according to Merriam-webster.com, the word
"Truth" is, "...in accordance with fact..," and
wikipedia.org indicates that, "...truth is the opposite of a false
statement.
However, dictionary.cambridge.org has other kinds of
"truth," for example, there are seven other kinds of truth, such as
"God's truth is "...said to emphasize that something is the complete
truth..." And all the other six
"truths" are variations of the Merriam-webster.com a basic
definition, "...in accordance with fact.
Moreover, when defining the noun word "truth"
clearly, this is a word that has one basic definition.
As well, "truth" is not a prediction, nor does
"truth" change when another statement is issued.
If a video of a previous statement by a person is shown,
then another newer version is not "truth," it's a new statement, until
another version is issued, and then all the versions of the same
"truth" are newer modified statements, the question then becomes, which
statement is the "truth"?
One could ask if "truth" can change, then is it
still "truth"?
There is no doubt that "truth" doesn't change when
expressing the "truth" of an active current issue, but stating the
"truth" has nothing to do with expediency, for instance, for members
of the government, whether it be state or federal, the "truth" is a
statement on an issue, if that statement changes, then the "truth" is
not an "explanation for a newer belief, the change then must be tested
with a version of the "truth" which is by Merriam-webster.com then
"...in accordance with fact..."
Only you can determine whether a newer statement that
changes "truth" is offered by an individual whose past "truth"
based actions are verifiable.
Thus it can be said, "truth" has a test.
