Sunday, October 7, 2018

"news"


   I’m still a New York Times “Book Review” section reader, even though in this political climate of disagreements this is a review of books often turned political—and I was fascinated by the Sunday, September 23rd review of the book, A Chill in the Air by Iris Origo delineating her diary impressions of wartime Italy as reviewed by Alexander Stille, especially the last paragraph of his sense of what Ms. Origo is noting as a final conclusion about moving a country not normally interested in war to a state of war.
   Stille is the reviewer of a book that is essentially a diary kept prior to the 2nd world war by someone who lived in Italy, who has read the book, and I haven’t, writes, “Origo notes that as the Fascist regime nudges Italy toward war, there is a careful psychological preparation: Supposedly scientific articles on the negative effects of coffee and meat appear weeks before the government will ration the sales of those items…”
   The above statement written in Ms. Origo’s diary according to Stille pertains to “news” reported in the Italian newspapers.

   I felt a chill of apprehension that relates to the current “main stream media” reports about news that they want to report and no reports about news they don’t want to  report.
  And I also felt a chill when I read the last portion of Stille’s commentary, …”Origo poses a question that seems deeply important in this time of resurgent nationalism: ‘is it possible to move a country to war, against it’s historical traditions, against the natural instincts and character of the majority of its inhabitants, and very possible against its own interests? Apparently it is possible.”

   Let me make clear, the chill I felt has nothing to do with Stille’s  claim of “in this time of resurgent nationalism.
   The chill I feel is what Stille says Ms. Origo wrote in her diary that pertains to “news” printed in Italian newspapers: “Origo notes that as the Fascist regime nudges Italy toward war, there is a careful psychological preparation” Supposedly scientific articles on the negative effects of coffee and meat appear weeks before the government will ration those items…”

   I shiver and feel the terrible apprehension of how in these times of “fake” news as POTUS 45 describes it, or as Ms. Origo says according to reviewer Stille, “there is a careful psychological preparation,” especially when articles in 2018 are written quoting “anonymous” sources that turn out to be half true, not true & downright false, or copious investigations about 45’s financial history, some 15,000 words reprinted not 1 time but a 2nd time in The New York Times.
   One more comment about “the grey lady’s” copious financial documentary about 45’s father, long deceased who worked with IRS and used IRS and NYC and NYState tax laws at that time, which all including the former Mayor of NYC, M. J. Bloomberg still use in 2018 to evade the tax burden: Wouldn’t this 15,000 word article be a psychological preparation for the Democrat control of congress and the “impeachment of POTUS 45?

   Perhaps another “psychological” preparation for what’s coming is Goggle sponsored heavily cable media advertised so-called impartial news app “Smart News.”
   What the behavioral psychologists have discovered that “chants” and “instruction” repeated by persons listening” does have a chilling effect to accomplish brain change.

   I ask you, do you want your brain and thought process changed to please someone in charge who knows better than you?








Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Rallying words


   Even prior to the 21st century rallying words were important, for instance in France the word solidarity was and still is used for the public to support the national interest, like the process of striking, and to allow the unions to walk out even when public transportation and basic services were curtailed, all with government sponsorship.
   Now in this contentious US 2018 partisan tribal politics making use of certain rallying words by political parties bring out certain groups to support their causes.
   For example, when addressing the intended audience to persuade for the purpose of becoming members of their political party, the Democrats use the words racist, homophobic, to address the issues that are part and parcel of their stated political concerns.
   The Republicans use the words socialist, leftist to disparage persons that are not in sync with the political views of those who do not aspire to join in support of the party’s view of the national good.

   What is most disturbing to me is the fact that globally and in the US, the political parties and politicians are not interested in having a national discussion about issues that are concerning many voters.
   The political parties and politicians encourage voters to discard the dictionary meaning of the rallying words they use.
   Global politicians no matter what the country use rallying words like dog whistles to bring the like minded together.
   Rallying words used by political parties and politicians in the US makes for the climate of a political divide that is becoming polarizing and spurring hatred, even violence against anyone who is on the opposite political spectrum.

   Yet, what is reassuring to me is that history shows the early part of a century mires the world in a series of upheavals.
   Violence and polarization is part of the historical context and small wars caused by countries that are seeking to expand economically, then finally a global war of sorts that align countries with similar economic interests to dominate the world.
   Oddly, terror is a tactic used throughout the millenniums, and it’s usually part of the realigning for the civilizations that seek world dominance.

   Using US history as my guide, I feel comfortable in making some US political assessments, if not outright predictions.
   When it comes to the current 2018 US political divide, many depend on polls, movements of women joined together to achieve a certain political result, LGBT’s push for recognition, the racial divide, but I chose to look at what has historically happened in the US.
   Our nation has overcome this and even a civil war, I have faith that our system of democracy will survive.
   Democracy survives when voters use their vote wisely.



















Sunday, August 19, 2018

Logic and sway


   For the first time in my life, I am questioning my ability to see issues logically.
   I will be traveling internationally in a few weeks, and I am wondering if the US of A’s 2018 discourse meltdown has influenced the international norms of logic to sway other individuals to change their POV.

   Yet, I know that in this US of A’s era of no truth, and just POV, the answer isn’t with me, it’s with a preponderance of journalism that became less of reporting and more of a particular opinion propped up with selective often anonymous sources.
   In most western nations there isn’t a complete “so-called 1st amendment protection” comparable to what the US of A has instituted during this last decade.
   Having lived overseas in the most Western of nations, I know from personal experience that government won’t allow reporting of events that could be considered as prejudicing against one particular religion, and might bring civil unrest.
    Most western nations don’t allow reporting of a divisive event unless it can be proven without a doubt that the motive was deleterious to the national good.

   So where does that leave me, as a citizen of the US of A?
   I have not let myself be dissuaded from using the norms that I was taught to use when I went to college, and did discovered that a POV must be based on a logical argument, that is, if I want to sway others.
   What I have discovered is that I no longer want to sway someone’s POV.
   Instead, I keep my opinions to myself, unless I am in a comfortable space with others where I can safely disagree after I listen to their POV, just like they have courteously listened to mine.

   Otherwise, the US of A will become what the philosopher David Hume determined as an  outcome of “cause and effect.
   For me the politically correct “every man/woman/LGBT” worst nightmare can be war in the streets of the US of A with another “Sacco & Venzitti” wrongful execution not in the courts, but by warlike groups who claim they are the fighters against intolerance.