The noun word "pluralism"
defined as noted in all my dictionary informational websites, does indicate
that the essence of "pluralism" is diversity, referencing a group of difference, both
ethnically, religiously and politically, all coexisting in harmony with each
other.
This idea of harmony in diversity
is possible when all groups accept each other's diversity, and learn from the
difference, as in the Britannica definition that references politics.
I've included a informational about
the origin of "pluralism."
And as well, all about the ancient
concept of "pluralism" that plato.standford.edu's website gives to
fully define, the conceptual paradigm, is as it had existed when the ancient
philosophers debated precepts, then argued as to whether there was a validity
to include diversity in modeling a society that some now call utopian.
However, I find that my research
proves the noun word "pluralism" as defined, indicates the varied
diversities can only exist when there are no political conflicts about power
sharing, too.
My research indicates that in this 21st
century, the global debate about political power is not conducive to achieving
the definition of "pluralism". What some in the EU call "far
right" and fear, may actually consist of a diverse political viewpoint,
thus the concept of "pluralism" has been stalemated by those in the
EU who will not allow this kind of diversity to exist.
Moreover, the refusal of
a diverse political point of view is an even fiercer argument in the USA, and has
led to excessive use of the courts that have befuddled the diversity concept
with Federal courts issuing orders as befits their political beliefs.
Thus, my conclusion, which is based on the information derived from all of my research sites, is that the
concept of "pluralism" as defined, is conceived as what could be in a utopian world.
