The “incompatabilist” sees a
world that can be logically determined and is totally at odds with the
non-logical “compatibilist.”
This 21st century has
so far produced a world of major powers with philosophical beliefs at odds with
the silent majority of individuals, who are increasingly thinking of pursuing an
illogical sense of freedom to act in favor of their motives, without regard for
the direction dictated by the established institutions.
Thereby guaranteeing the anti-establishment
“compatibilist” at odds with the institution bound “incompatabilist” globalist,
at least until mid-century.
In 2015, the UK was struck with a
“Brexit” vote of “compatibilist” individuals with the freedom to vote for their
motives.
Then the 2016 US Presidential
election was another win for “Compatabilist” free spirits, who were intuitive
when it came to chose the kind of candidate with a team to scour for voters in
the states needed to win the Electoral College vote.
Enough individuals with “free
will to act according to one’s motives without arbitrary hindrance from individuals
or institutions” resided in the states where the voters elected a Presidential
candidate the polls predicted as the certain loser.
*Wikipedia’s definition of the “compatibilist”
provides the reason why the 2016 election result is still such a shock.
At odds with the US 2016 result,
now the bi-coastal elite class who have the money to fund their “inconpatabilist”
beliefs are into the fall of 2017, and they have spurred the minority political
party loser to empower “incompatabilist” voters to resist and protest.
There are plenty of California
silicon valley “determinedly incompatabilist” donors to fund seminars created
to lure “incompatabilist” individuals who will gather others to secure a 2020
landslide electoral College vote for the “incompatabilist” candidate in
addition to the popular vote.
Other wealthy donors like George
Soros fund “incompatabilist” groups like moveon.org, and others like-minded also
fund paid organizers who specialize in gathering all “incompatabilists” in the
1-party majority states where the losing candidate won the popular vote—these
organizers pay social media experts to post an “incompatabilist” calendar of
protest marches providing information about the time, date and place.
As well, the losing political
party has rich “incompatabilist” donors who are funding groups that specialize
in uncovering the kind of evidence that will sour “compatibilist” voters, and
convert them to voters who vote for "incompatabilist" candidates.
The “incompatabilist” major
newspapers have hired teams of reporters to dig into every uncovered nugget of
grounds for impeachment—the stories produced
quote “unnamed sources” but provide fodder for the “incompatabilist” agenda
major TV networks to endlessly pick at with glee.
However, even when personal
opinion becomes the basis for headlines, nine months into the first term of
POTUS 45, evidence proves elusive for an indisputable impeachable offense that
will drive the nation’s 2016 legally elected POTUS out of office.
The results of all of the above
have yet to prove any of the suppositions presented in great detail.
Perhaps the 2018 US Congressional
and Senatorial elections will determine whether free will versus dogmatic logic
can win enough votes to change the
balance of power in a nation divided.
No comments:
Post a Comment