In this uncertain 21st century of
pandemics and claims of climate change disasters that some say will make our
future on this planet a hell without an immediate conversion to non-fossil
means of powering our industries and immediate changes to the way we live and
eat, the idea that a "benefit" is something good is what most of us
believe.
Consider that perhaps we believe a
"benefit" is good because the
dictionary definition has taught us to recognize this word when we see it
applied to government.
In the USA, the Federal government uses the word
"benefit" frequently when describing the Federal government's means
of paying citizens for a variety of things, starting with Social Security for
instance, or Medicaid, or Medicare or
some kind of "health care" offering to citizens in certain
categories.
The word "benefit" is also used by
employers to lure employees to join the company.
However, the words "unintended
consequences" are used to describe how a "benefit" can become
something else that is "unintended."
The questions that only you can answer:
If these words "benefit" and "unintended consequences" are applied to "COVID-19 forever" specifically to the "benefiters" of "COVID-19 forever," can we conclude that "COVID-19 forever" is now a means of "income" or "additional income" to many?
And
for the current Biden Federal administration is "COVID-19 forever" a
good way to guarantee reelection in 2024
and perpetuity, too?"
Can we conclude that 1 major political party needs and wants COVID-19 forever for political reasons?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/benefit
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintended_consequences
* PLEASE NOTE
This blog does not express opinions, we ask questions and state the answers from approved sources like Google, Wikipedia and other reputable websites
No comments:
Post a Comment